Skip to content

Add VARIANT type to ColumnInfoTypeName for correct SEA metadata#1388

Merged
sreekanth-db merged 4 commits intomainfrom
worktree-variant-fix
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

Add VARIANT type to ColumnInfoTypeName for correct SEA metadata#1388
sreekanth-db merged 4 commits intomainfrom
worktree-variant-fix

Conversation

@sreekanth-db
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • VARIANT columns in the SEA path returned null for getColumnClassName() because ColumnInfoTypeName had no VARIANT enum value, causing Jackson deserialization to fail silently
  • Added VARIANT to the enum and all relevant type mapping methods (getColumnInfoType, getColumnType, getColumnTypeClassName) so both SEA and Thrift paths return consistent metadata (java.lang.String, Types.OTHER)
  • Added test coverage for all new VARIANT mappings

Test plan

  • DatabricksTypeUtilTest — 59 tests pass (includes new VARIANT assertions in testGetColumnType, testGetColumnTypeClassName, testGetColumnInfoType, testIsSigned)
  • DatabricksResultSetMetaDataTest — 28 tests pass
  • E2E verification: ran example_run_variant against live workspace — both THRIFT and SEA return ColumnClassName=java.lang.String, ColumnTypeName=VARIANT

This pull request was AI-assisted by Isaac.

VARIANT columns in SEA path returned null for getColumnClassName()
because ColumnInfoTypeName had no VARIANT value, causing Jackson
deserialization to return null. Add VARIANT to the enum and type
mapping methods so both SEA and Thrift paths return consistent
metadata.

Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Vadigi <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Vadigi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Vadigi <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Isaac
Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Vadigi <[email protected]>
@sreekanth-db sreekanth-db enabled auto-merge (squash) April 9, 2026 19:50
@sreekanth-db sreekanth-db merged commit e0ef2e7 into main Apr 9, 2026
15 checks passed
@sreekanth-db sreekanth-db deleted the worktree-variant-fix branch April 9, 2026 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants